#1
Both the endings of the novel and
the film are in a way appropriate for film noir and somewhat not appropriate. I
was excited on watching the ending of the film hoping it would be better than
the novel’s but I stayed in the middle; liking and disliking both. To start
off, the ending of the novel portrayed Phyllis as the femme fatal way more than
the film’s ending did. In the end of the novel she talks about how she’s going
to meet with the love of her life, referring to death. I don’t know about you
but that gives me the chills. She’s seen as a crazy death-loving woman in that
ending. On the other hand, in the film’s ending she doesn’t seem as reckless as
a femme fatal. Of course her plan is to kill Walter Huff but she chickens out
after she misses to kill him in the first shot. She does not just withdraw from
the attempt to kill him but confesses to him that she is madly crazy in love
with him. A real femme fatal, as they
are described, would have shot him again without thinking twice about it and
she would have definitely not confessed any sort of love to the man she was using
to her advantage. Now, about the way they died, the ending of the film was most
appropriate. Phyllis needed to beg for mercy at her time of death instead of making
her own choice about it and that’s how it happened in the film. Overall, the
ending of the novel was the most appropriate for film noir for the reason that Phyllis
was portrayed as the femme fatal until the end as Walter the weak ambiguous
protagonist who falls too easy. Though that was the most appropriate, I believe
the novel would have been perfect if Walter Huff would have got away with his
plan to kill her in the park.
#4
Actor Barbara Stanwyck was appropriate
for her role in the novel. Barbara Stanwyck was clearly the women I was
imagining for the role of the femme fatal while reading the novel. She is an attractive
woman with a thin fit figure. Her facial features seem very sweet and innocent,
fooling anybody into thinking she’s an angel but with a lift of one eyebrow the
image you once had of her turns to something uncomfortably evil. From the beginning
to the end of the novel, Barbara Stanwyck stuck to her role and did a great
job. She was fit for the role as a femme fatal. In contrast, Fred MacMurray was
not who I was expecting to do the role of the protagonist. First of all his voice
didn’t sound of a man who would be weak for any women who gave him an eyebrow
lift. He also didn’t seem to me as a guy who would be single at that age but
more of a family guy who would do no harm. In my opinion, a taller guy with finer
cheek bones like for example, actor James Franco would have fit the role
perfectly.

I like your analysis of the actors. I completely agree with what you said about Ms. Stanwyck; she did fit the role of the Femme Fatale quite well. A pretty face who could stab you in the back without batting an eyelash. I don't so much agree with what you said about Fred MacMurray though. Yes, perhaps a different looking man could have pulled it off better, but I think he played his role well. Especially considering how far from his norm it was.
ReplyDeleteAnd you're right about the endings too. I hadn't really thought about how Phyllis was portrayed in the novel, only in the movie. Since you brought it up, I can see that the novel was more in line with Film Noir. But the end of the film was more satisfying.
Good post.
Nice job Stephanie, Barbera Stanwick played a great role of a femme ffattale in Double Indemnity. Her deminer throught the movie really carried it. She was very cunning, charming yet played all of the men that she encountered. I agree that the ending of the novel is a better choice for film noir, It seemed a little darker and more mystery surrounded what happend at the end of the novel. It was left open to our imaginations as to exactly how everything played out at the end even though we knew what they had planned to do.
ReplyDelete